The Doorway to Hell (1930) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch

on
  The Doorway to Hell (1930) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch  American Film, Crime, Drama Academy Awards, 1931- Nominee: Best Writing, Original Story The early 1930s in Hollywood were marked by a frantic, electric energy as the industry found its voice—literally. In the middle of this transition, a gritty little gem called The Doorway to Hell slipped into theaters, offering a blueprint for the gangster epics that would soon dominate the silver screen. While it often sits in the shadow of the titans that followed, this film captures a specific, raw moment in cinematic history that feels surprisingly modern even today. More on Wikipedia or Mubi  The Brutal Elegance of The Doorway to Hell  At its heart, the story follows a young gang leader who attempts to trade the chaos of the underworld for a quiet, respectable life. It is a classic American tragedy wrapped in the smoke of a speakeasy. The narrative leans heavily into the irony of a man trying to es...
0

Watch Retour à la vie (1949)

on

 

Watch Retour à la vie (1949)
French Film, War, Comedy, Drama
English title: Return to Life

Cannes Film Festival, 1949- Official Selection

Released in 1949, just four years after the liberation of France, the portmanteau film Retour à la vie (Return to Life) offers a complex and often poignant look at the struggles faced by French prisoners of war. Deportees returning home after World War II. Moving beyond mere celebration, this anthology film explores the deep and often jarring difficulties of social, emotional, and psychological re-adaptation in post-war France. More on Wikipedia or Mubi

A Collaboration of Master Filmmakers

The film is notable for its structure as a collection of five distinct segments, each directed by one of four prominent French filmmakers, making it a unique collaborative project of the era. The directors involved were: André Cayatte, Henri-Georges Clouzot, Jean Dréville, and Georges Lampin. The screenplay, generally credited to Charles Spaak, provided the unifying theme for the five stories, though Clouzot also contributed to the writing of his segment. This mix of directorial styles results in an anthology that shifts in tone from cynical drama to mordant comedy.

Synopsis: Five Journeys of Re-adaptation

The film presents the challenging return of a woman and four men to their former lives, highlighting that the "return to life" was anything but simple.

  1. "Le retour de Tante Emma" (The Return of Aunt Emma), directed by André Cayatte and starring Bernard Blier, is one of the more cynical pieces. It tells the story of Aunt Emma, a frail survivor of the Dachau concentration camp, whose pitiable state is quickly exploited by her greedy and unsympathetic family who are only interested in her property.

  2. "Le retour d'Antoine" (The Return of Antoine), directed by Georges Lampin and featuring François Périer, sees Antoine, a barman, return to his job in a hotel that has been requisitioned by American WACs (Women's Army Corps), leading to unexpected and sentimental romantic complications.

  3. "Le retour de Jean" (The Return of Jean), directed by Henri-Georges Clouzot and starring Louis Jouvet, is arguably the film's darkest and most famous episode. Jean Girard, who has survived a Nazi prison camp, finds himself living in a boarding house where he recognizes a fellow boarder as his former Gestapo torturer, prompting him to take justice into his own hands.

  4. "Le retour de René" (The Return of René), directed by Jean Dréville, features Noël-Noël as René, a presumed "national hero" (the 1,500,000th repatriate), who faces a chaotic domestic situation: his wife has left him, and his apartment is occupied by a woman with children, forcing him to adapt to a life that is no longer his.

  5. "Le retour de Louis" (The Return of Louis), also directed by Jean Dréville and starring Serge Reggiani, addresses the post-war bitterness towards Germany. Louis returns home married to a young German woman, a scandalous union that causes his village to turn against them, nearly leading to tragedy.

    Themes and Legacy

    The overarching theme of Retour à la vie is the profound psychological and social rift created by the war. The film explores social isolation, the difficulty for survivors to reconnect with a society that has moved on, often failing to comprehend the trauma they endured. It delves into trauma and justice, examining the struggle to reconcile personal suffering with a return to normalcy and the desire for retribution. Finally, it highlights the post-War bitterness and the challenges of national reconciliation through themes of domestic and personal disruption. A significant work of post-war French cinema, the film was entered into the 1949 Cannes Film Festival. While uneven due to its multi-director structure, the segments are powerful, with Henri-Georges Clouzot's contribution often noted for its stark, unflinching drama. Retour à la vie remains a vital document, offering a candid and sobering portrait of the challenging reality for the millions of French citizens attempting to navigate the long and arduous "return to life" in the shadow of war.

    The Ethical and Moral Context

    In ethics and morality, "good" generally refers to:

  6. Moral Excellence: Actions, intentions, or character traits that promote well-being, happiness, and justice for oneself and others.

  7. Virtues: Qualities like kindness, honesty, compassion, courage, and fairness.

    The Right Action: Doing what is morally correct, often defined by adherence to a set of principles (like duties or rules) or by its positive consequences (like maximizing happiness).

    "Not good" or     Moral Deficiency: 

    Actions or intentions that cause harm, suffering, or injustice.

    • Vices: Qualities like cruelty, dishonesty, selfishness, and greed.

      The Wrong Action: Doing what is morally incorrect, often violating principles or leading to negative outcomes. 

      For example, donating time to a charity is widely considered good, while lying to intentionally hurt someone is generally not good.

      The Quality and Usefulness Context

      In a non-moral sense, "good" and "not good" relate to quality, effectiveness, or fitness for a purpose:

    • Good: Something that is high quality, effective, well-made, or useful for a specific purpose. For example, a "good car" is reliable and performs well. A "good answer" is accurate and clear.

    • Not Good (or Poor): Something that is low quality, ineffective, poorly made, or fails to meet a standard. For example, a "not good phone" might constantly freeze or have a short battery life.

    • The Subjective Context

      It's important to remember that definitions of good and bad are often subjective, varying based on culture, personal beliefs, and the situation:

    • Cultural Differences: What is polite and respectful (good) in one culture might be rude (not good) in another.

      • Personal Preference: What one person considers a "good song" (enjoyable and well-composed) might be disliked by someone else.

      • Relativity: An action might be good in one situation but bad in another. For instance, breaking a promise is generally bad, but if keeping the promise would lead to catastrophic harm, breaking it might be considered the lesser of two evils.

      Ultimately, the core of "good" tends to be anything that promotes flourishing, health, and harmony, while "not good" or "bad" involves anything that promotes suffering, deterioration, or conflict.
      Full Film

Comments

Post a Comment