Elephant Boy (1937) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch

  Elephant Boy (1937) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch  British Film, Adventure Venice Film Festival, 1937- 2 wins including: Best Director National Board of Review, 1937- Winner: Top Foreign Films Long before CGI could conjure up entire jungles at the click of a button, cinema had to rely on the real deal. In 1937, Robert Flaherty and Zoltan Korda teamed up to deliver Elephant Boy , an adventure film that stands as a fascinating bridge between raw documentary realism and classic Hollywood storytelling. More on Wikipedia or Mubi The Raw Magic of Elephant Boy  The movie is adapted from "Toomai of the Elephants," a short story out of Rudyard Kipling’s iconic The Jungle Book . It follows a young, spirited Indian boy who dreams of becoming a great hunter, just like his father and grandfather before him. When a massive elephant hunt is organized, Toomai sets out to prove his worth, forming an unbreakable bond with a legendary, giant elephant named Kala Nag. W...

Cannes Film Festival, 2025- Red Carpet Chronicles: Fashion, Faux Pas, and the "Decency" Debates

 

Cannes Film Festival, 2025- Red Carpet Chronicles: Fashion, Faux Pas, and the “Decency” Debates

Ah, the red carpet! The very heart of Cannes glamour, where fashion statements are made, and sometimes, rules are broken. This year, however, the red carpet arrived with a new set of directives that certainly stirred the sartorial pot. Organizers introduced a stricter dress code, explicitly prohibiting "naked dressing" and "oversized outfits" – particularly those with "large trains that hinder the proper flow of traffic of guests and complicate seating in the theatre". The official line cited "decency reasons" and practicality, encouraging instead "cocktail and black dresses," "dark-coloured pantsuits," and "elegant" footwear. Men, bless their hearts, simply had to stick to tuxedos or dark suits.

This diktat, announced just before the festival, caused a ripple of "panic and irritation" among fashionable attendees and design houses. Critics quickly branded it a "push towards the conservative," questioning the festival's attempt to "police women's bodies" and highlighting the glaring inconsistency with the festival's own lack of rules regarding nudity

on screen. As feminist author Natasha Walter pointed out, banning revealing attire can be counterproductive, akin to "school uniforms for girls" where a "tiny skirt becomes an act of rebellion". The question of why men were not subject to similar restrictions also loomed large. This dynamic reveals that the red carpet is not merely a display of fashion; it is a highly curated, high-stakes performance space. The festival's attempt to impose "decency" and "practicality" reflects an institutional desire for control and perhaps a return to a more traditional image. However, the actions of celebrities, whether through overt defiance or subtle "girth" in their gowns, demonstrate their agency and the power of individual expression within this controlled environment. This creates a dynamic tension where the red carpet becomes a microcosm of broader societal debates around freedom, censorship, and gendered expectations.

Despite the new rules, many celebrities, bless their defiant hearts, found ways to "show out".


Rihanna and A$AP Rocky made their presence known in Saint Laurent and Alaïa, respectively.

Halle Berry, a jury member, famously declared she would not break the rules, only to appear in a voluminous pink gingham and black Celia Kritharioti gown that certainly "took up space".

Eva Longoria and Heidi Klum also arrived in gowns of considerable girth, while others like Iris Mittenaere, Meredith Duxbury, and Blanca Blanco arguably broke the "naked dressing" code with their revealing choices. Even

Jeremy Strong, a jury member, flouted the men's dark suit rule with a "hot peach tuxedo". The controversy around banning "naked dressing" explicitly linked to "decency reasons" , yet critics pointed out the inconsistency with on-screen nudity and argued it "bolsters objectification and hyper-sexualisation of women". This highlights a deeper societal paradox: while the festival champions artistic freedom that often includes nudity on screen, it simultaneously attempts to regulate female bodies on its public-facing red carpet. This suggests that "decency" in this context is less about genuine modesty and more about controlling public perception and avoiding perceived "scandals," which can inadvertently reinforce the very objectification it claims to prevent by focusing disproportionately on women's attire. The debate underscores the ongoing struggle for women to reclaim their sexuality and expression on their own terms in the public eye.

Beyond the controversies, the red carpet delivered its usual dose of breathtaking fashion. Cate Blanchett dazzled in dramatic Louis Vuitton, and Elle Fanning charmed in fairy-tale Chanel.

Dakota Johnson sparkled in Gucci , while

Julia Garner also opted for Gucci.

Isabelle Huppert (Balenciaga), Austin Butler (The Row, Saint Laurent), Riz Ahmed (Prada), and Natalie Portman (Dior Haute Couture) were among the "Top 10 Best Dressed". However, some fashion commentators noted a "Fan Bingbing-shaped void" and a quiet year for new breakout style stars, perhaps hinting at a more subdued, albeit elegant, overall fashion landscape.

And for a moment that truly defined "it happens, folks, even at Cannes," there was the delightful Halle Berry and Juliette Binoche wardrobe malfunction at the closing ceremony. Berry's lace gown got caught on Binoche's beaded culotte and jacket combo, requiring assistance from other attendees – a charmingly human moment amidst all the polished perfection.

Comments