Marie Antoinette (1938) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch

  Marie Antoinette (1938) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch  American Film, Drama, History Venice Film Festival, 1938- Winner: Best Actress Academy Awards, 1939- 4 nominations including: Best Actress in a Leading Role When Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer poured an astronomical budget into bringing the doomed French queen to the silver screen in nineteen thirty-eight, Hollywood was not merely making a movie; it was constructing an entire vanished world. Directed primarily by W. S. Van Dyke, Marie Antoinette stands today as one of the ultimate monuments to the golden age of American cinema, a sprawling historical epic that blends lavish romance with the looming terror of the French Revolution.  More on Wikipedia or Mubi  Cinematic Splendor and Tragedy in Hollywood's 1938 Marie Antoinette  At the heart of the production is Norma Shearer, reigning royalty of the studio lot and widow of legendary producer Irving Thalberg, who had passionately championed the pr...

Don Quixote (1957) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch

 
Don Quixote (1957) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch
Don Quixote (1957) Review: The Good, The Bad & How to Watch 

Soviet Film, Drama
Russian title: Don Kikhot

Cannes Film Festival, 1957- Official Selection
Berlin Film Festival, 1993- Official Selection 

Long before Hollywood kept trying and failing to capture the elusive spirit of Miguel de Cervantes’ literary titan, a Soviet film crew quietly managed to create one of the most sublime page-to-screen adaptations in cinematic history. Released in 1957, Grigori Kozintsev’s Don Kikhot remains a triumph of visual storytelling, artistic integrity, and deep human empathy. More on Wikipedia or Mubi 

The Soviet Masterpiece That Got Don Quixote Right 

hot in vibrant Sovcolor and wide widescreen formats on location in the sun-drenched landscapes of Crimea, the film brought the iconic 17th-century Spanish novel to life with breathtaking grandeur. Yet, beneath its rich costuming and sweeping vistas lies a soulfulness that few knight-errant movies ever manage to capture. Kozintsev, who would later earn international acclaim for his cinematic takes on Shakespeare’s Hamlet and King Lear, treated Cervantes’ satire not merely as a slapstick comedy about a delusional old man, but as a tender tragedy about idealism surviving in a cynical world.

Central to the film’s lasting magic is the performance of Nikolai Cherkasov as the titular knight, Don Quixote of La Mancha. Cherkasov, already a legend of Soviet cinema known for his heroic roles in Eisenstein’s Alexander Nevsky and Ivan the Terrible, delivered a radically different portrayal here. Towering, gaunt, and endlessly expressive, Cherkasov infused the knight with a delicate mix of nobility, foolishness, and heartbreaking vulnerability. Beside him, Yuri Tolubeyev’s Sancho Panza provided the perfect grounding counterweight—practical, warm, and bound by a genuine love for his misguided master.

What makes the 1957 adaptation so remarkable is its refusal to mock Quixote’s quest. While the film retains the legendary encounters with windmills and sheep, Kozintsev directs these moments with a gentle dignity. The film highlights the stark contrast between the cruel, decadent aristocracy that uses Quixote for sport and the pure-hearted old man who genuinely wants to protect the weak. In doing so, the director created a subtle commentary on human resilience that resonated far beyond Soviet borders, earning a prestigious nomination at the 1957 Cannes Film Festival and critical praise across the West.

Decades later, Kozintsev’s film stands out as a shimmering example of how cinema can honor classic literature without becoming stiff or overly theatrical. It is a warm, visually magnificent reflection on dreamers, tragic ideals, and the enduring need for kindness in a world that often forgets its value.

The Good 

What makes the film truly exceptional is its profound emotional core and magnificent visual presence. Nikolai Cherkasov delivers an iconic performance as Quixote, balancing physical comedy with deep dignity and a delicate vulnerability. Alongside him, Yuri Tolubeyev’s Sancho Panza offers a grounded, affectionate warmth that anchors their journey. Kozintsev shoots the Crimean wilderness in rich Sovcolor, turning wide, sunlit landscapes into living oil paintings. Rather than mocking the old knight's foolishness, the movie respects his pure heart, highlighting the contrast between his romantic ideals and the cruel, unfeeling aristocracy around him. 

The Bad 

 On the other hand, the film suffers from the unavoidable limits of squeezing a massive epic into a two-hour runtime. Massive subplots, side characters, and rambling adventures from Cervantes' novel had to be cut, which leaves the narrative feeling somewhat episodic and hurried in places. The director also trades away much of the novel's lighthearted satire in favor of a melancholic, almost tragic atmosphere. For modern viewers, the deliberate pacing, theatrical acting traditions, and sweeping orchestral score might feel a bit stiff compared to contemporary cinema.
English subtitles

Comments